While reading a book today I came across a case study, which I personally found worth sharing. This could be a very good practise resource for anybody starting his career in VoIP Solution Designing. Now without taking much of your time, let met take you straight to the matter -
Case Study -
XYZ Company has
decided to interconnect its PBXs and key system over the IP WAN, as opposed to
using the T1 and fractional T1 connections. Therefore, your goal in this
case study is to create a design that places a router at each XYZ Company
location and to specify the router interfaces used to connect remote routers.
Also, each XYZ Company location needs connections to its local CO as
follows:
-
Headquarters48 connections to local CO
-
Remote Office 124 connections to local CO
-
Remote Office 25 connections to local CO
In addition to the required solution, you also need to calculate the required voice bandwidth, the links in
this converged network solution also need to transport data. The data bandwidth
requirements are as follows:
Demonstrate in your design how the router at each XYZ Company
location connects into its local CO. This VoIP design lays the foundation for
eventually replacing the PBXs and key system units with IP telephony components
such as the Cisco CallManager
Suggested Solution -
Although multiple solutions exist for the design scenario
presented, the following is a suggested solution that meets the design criteria.
The router located at the XYZ Company HQ needs WAN connectivity with each remote
office. Based on the bandwidth requirements calculated, we have the following voice
bandwidth requirements for each of these WAN links:
In addition to voice, these intersite links need to carry data.
The data requirements specified in the case study were:
To accommodate both voice and data, we sum the required
bandwidth (that is, the voice bandwidth plus the data bandwidth) for these links
to calculate each link's total required bandwidth:
Although we could select from various WAN technologies to
interconnect these sites (for example, Frame Relay, Point-to-Point Protocol
[PPP], or Asynchronous Transfer Mode [ATM]), this suggested solution uses PPP
links. The headquarters connects to Remote Office 1 using two T1s. Two T1s
actually provide more bandwidth than the required 2.794 Mbps. However, these two
T1s allow room for future growth. In this design, the two T1s are combined into
a single logical link, using Multilink PPP (MLPPP)
.
The headquarters connects to Remote Office 2 using a fractional
T1, running at 512 kbps. Again, the allocated bandwidth is a little more than
the required 465.68 kbps, thus allowing for future growth.
The routers at each site should also connect to their local CO.
As a best practice, once we exceed eight connections, we should choose digital
interfaces instead of analog interfaces, due to cost considerations. Therefore,
this suggested design selected the following CO connections for the XYZ Company
routers:
-
Headquarters Router: Two T1 connections
-
Remote Office 1 Router: One T1 connection
-
Remote Office 2 Router: Five FXO connections
 |
VoIP Solution Diagram |
You might also like these recent post -
IPv6 Benefits - Its more than just larger address space - Read This
Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) - The Necessary Evil - Read This
Five Most Commonly used Networking Technologies - Read This
Understanding Five Nines of Uptime - Read This
Distribured Virtual Datacenter for Enterprise cloud - Read This
Cisco ASR 9000 - Network Virtualization Technology - Read This
Found it useful, Consider sharing it with your friends -